Houston Massacre (Camp Logan) –-1917

First, let’s dispel a few misconceptions about what has become known as the Houston Massacre(AKA Camp Logan Riot). Despite what you’ll read on almost all websites regarding this incident,
it had …

–NOTHING to do with American (White) racism

–NOTHING to do with the color line mandate (AKA Jim Crow)

–NOTHING to do with Negroes hearing the word “nigger” from a few Americans (as if uttering that word could justify the slaughter of innocent people)

If there was one event prior to the Civil Rights Act (1964) that should have raised the proverbial RED flag regarding the radical new concept of racial integration (a concept invented by the NAACP in 1910) , it was the racially motivated massacre of innocent Americans in the city of Houston in 1917.

On the evening of August 23, 1917, 156 Negro males, employed by the US military for non-combat assignments, mutinied at Camp Logan (situated a few miles north of Houston) over what they believed was the unfair incarceration of a fellow Negro soldier being held in the Houston city jail. That is, they wanted him out … and by whatever means necessary (no other reason than this did the Negro soldiers mutiny).  Led by their First Sergeant, Vida Henry, the Negroes first broke into the weapons depot and stole weapons.  They then marched out of camp toward Houston’s [White] police department — again, ostensibly to force the release of their jailed comrade.  However, the undisciplined men never made it to their intended destination. Instead, they broke off into groups. Most went back to camp.  Other groups, or more specifically, members within these groups, believed, since they now had the cover of night,  it was a golden opportunity to kill Americans … and get away with it (all the shots fired that night came from the Negro soldiers, and all the victims were non-Negroes). The death count from the Negro mutiny shocked as well as outraged the entire country : 16 innocent Americans (all but two unarmed) plus one innocent Mexican.     NOTE: On Wikipedia, their version claims that there was a pitched battle between the Negro soldiers and white civilians and police.  Not true at all. My version here was taken directly from the book  – the definitive book on the 1917 Houston massacre – Haynes, Robert V. 1976. A Night of Violence: The Houston Riot of 1917.

Naturally, no one was surprised that the American military brass dealt harshly with the mutinous Negroes. For the mutiny, and principally because of the senseless and racially motivated slaughter of unarmed civilians, a total of 19 Negro soldiers were hung, 41 were sentenced to life imprisonment (ten additional negroes were sentenced to death but commuted to life sentences by president Wilson). source

One curious observation here (which wouldn’t have prevented the Houston massacre, but still it’s curious)::  Why did the US military brass – all of whom were Americans – allow Negro males to wear the same military uniforms as the American soldiers?  This decision, in effect, told both groups they were one and the same.   This was hardly the case.  Negro soldiers were not allowed to see combat duty, to carry weapons, or mingle with American soldiers. Nor were Negro officers allowed to give orders to American soldiers.   While integration of the races sounds acceptable today, back in 1917  the United States was operating under Plessy vs. Ferguson, which legally allowed for the establishment of a color line between the two demonstratively different male groups. The American population at that time believed (for they had never known anything different) that Negroes were supposed to live separately so they could achieve self-reliance as a people i.e. Americans did not want the Negroes to become their dependents  –feed them, house them, clothe them  (remember, no laws were denying the Negro race their right to build their own towns, their own cities, their own industries, and to create their own political titles; or even colonizing a place in America –they were a FREE PEOPLE).  Regarding the uniforms issue, what was a very obvious and sensible solution to the  military’s hypocrisy was to have the Negro and American soldiers wear different uniforms. This certainly would have alleviated most of the tension as well as confusion between the two groups. A good example of this would be the different uniforms wore by the English and Scottish troops during World War I.

So why did the U.S. gov’t allow the military brass to violate the legally established color line and allow Negro males to wear the same uniforms as Americans? (In 1917, there were no Negro males in the US Congress; nor were any in the federal judiciary i.e. the Negro race was entirely separate from the American population))

One finale note:   No sensible-minded person today should let themselves be influenced by the views of politically correct revisionists regarding the Houston massacre. It was a   racially motivated slaughter of innocent people by craven Negro soldiers. To attempt to make these  Negro soldiers the victims is not just outrageous and ludicrous but also insulting to the memory of the innocent victims.

This entry was posted in Black Racism - Black Hate and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Houston Massacre (Camp Logan) –-1917

  1. Jack Johnson says:

    You sir are a racist son of a bitch! How dare you refer to black American Soldiers as Negro Soldiers and the Whites as “American Soldiers”. If you study your history, you will find that one of the greatest massacres to take place was the killing of some 3200 Black Americans in Tulsa, Oklahoma in June 1921. If possible, read this for yourself at: http://sfbayview.com/2011/what-happened-to-black-wall-street-on-june-1-1921/. People like you think that all of us “Negros” want to “Fuck” white women. That’s were it all starts isn’t it? You guys are terrified that some black buck is gonna stick 9-inches in some white woman. Oh yeah, “Blacks Lynching Blacks”??! Not in this country. Intelligence plus character-that is the goal of true education. With that being said, go educate yourself!

  2. “You sir are a racist son of a bitch”

    No I’m not. However, you, sir, may believe what you want. Couldn’t care less…

    From 1790 to 1964 (the year forced integration was created) Blacks were NOT the recognized Americans. White Christian males were the creators of all the political and economic arenas in America prior to 1964, making THEM the recognized Americans. It was they who gave the Negro contract rights with the 14th Amendment. Negroes, from 1865 to 1964 were suppose to be separate from the Americans – to develop their own distinct culture and, most important, not to develop a dependence on the American population. After 1865, blacks were a FREE people.

    Regarding the Tulsa riot, your death figure is totally absurd –about 30 Negroes died. Also, there was no “black wallstreet”. I am writing a blog about the total truth of this riot. Much like I did with the Rosewood riots.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s